483 vs Warning Letter: What’s The Difference?

by | Oct 14, 2019 | Enforcement Actions, FDA, Medical Devices, Quality Systems, Warning Letter

The terms “Form 483” and “warning letter” can incite dread for those that market their medical device in the US, but what exactly are they and how do you deal with them? To begin it’s important to note that an “FDA Form 483” and a “warning letter” are a part of the same process but are two different things.

A 483 is issued to a company at the end of an FDA inspection, it documents any conditions that the inspector believes may violate FDA regulation. Its purpose is to notify the company’s management of any conditions observed and allow them to discuss and respond. Once you have received the 483 you only have 15 days to respond thoroughly. A response to a 483 should address each item and provide a timeline for corrective action.1

A 483 is not considered a final agency determination, so it is only a piece of what the agency looks at when determining a company’s compliance. A separate inspection report (the Establishment Inspection Report, completed by the inspector) and your response (which is why it’s important to provide a thorough and timely one) are also evaluated to determine a final judgment. If the agency determines that a serious violation may exist, you will receive an FDA Warning Letter. When you receive a warning letter it is imperative that you create and implement corrective actions and have a detailed plan laid out for every finding. If you responded to the 483 and still receive a warning letter, simply resubmitting your response will not suffice. A warning letter is a serious escalation of any observations during your inspection; they have mandatory requirements and are made public so anyone can search for them online.2

The escalation from a form 483 to a warning letter is something every medical device company wants to avoid, which is why it’s critical to respond to any 483 observations as seriously as if they were enforcement actions. This is the time for the upper management team to analyze their quality system and any processes with nonconformances. While the whole process may feel intimidating, ultimately, it’s the goal that the company will come out on the other side with an improved quality system.

With all the work that needs to go into 483’s and/or warning letters, it is beneficial to consider obtaining some outside experts to help your team through the process. EMMA International has the regulatory expertise to help your team analyze any 483 and/or warning letter findings and respond to the agency effectively – give us a call at 248-987-4497 or email info@emmainternational.com for more information!


1FDA (July 2019) FDA Form 483 Frequently Asked Questions retrieved on 10/08/2019 from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/fda-form-483-frequently-asked-questions

2FDA (September 2018) Letters To Industry retrieved on 10/09/2019 from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/industry-medical-devices/letters-industry

Emma International

Emma International

More Resources

Change Management And Control

Change Management And Control

One of the biggest and most important aspects of quality management is a system to monitor changes and how they impact the product. Change management is an approach for changing processes or products in a way which adheres to regulatory standards by ensuring stability and consistency throughout processes. It applies across all changes within a process and throughout an entire products life cycle.
Aseptic Technique and Gowning

Aseptic Technique and Gowning

One of the most common techniques to prevent contamination of products and reduce quality impacts in the pharmaceutical industry is called aseptic gowning. Humans are the biggest sources of microbial contamination in cleanroom environments and therefore proper gowning procedures are essential to ensuring product quality. Proper training, education, hygiene, qualification, and authorization must be put in place and be required for entry to all clean room environments...
Importance of Pharmaceutical GMP

Importance of Pharmaceutical GMP

Having high quality standards is vital to any organization but is even more essential in the pharmaceutical industry. Practices that are governed by these standards are commonly called Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and ensure consistent and controlled production of products. These practices govern all aspects and procedures within production and provide documented proof that procedures are consistently followed during the manufacturing processes every time products are made. They are designed to minimize risks throughout the manufacturing process that are not able to be eliminated in final product testing so that pharmaceuticals are safe for use...

Ready to learn more about working with us?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This