Medical Device Post-Market Surveillance Requirements

by | Oct 5, 2020 | FDA, Medical Devices, Quality, Regulatory

Medical device manufacturers are responsible for not only developing safe and effective devices, but also ensuring that they continue to monitor the safety/effectiveness of the manufactured devices that are on the market. The requirement for post-market surveillance (PMS) was implemented so that manufacturers understood that their device is still their responsibility even after it has left their manufacturing site and entered the market. PMS is intended to be a reporting system that manufacturers can utilize to continuously monitor device performance and learn from any mistakes such as adverse events.

Every manufacturer that has a medical device on the US market is familiar with 21 CFR Part 820, the Quality System Regulation (QSR). Although the QSR details all the requirements for firms to develop and manufacturer medical devices, there is no mention of post-market surveillance; instead, manufacturers will have to look to 21 CFR part 822 for details on requirements for PMS. Part 822 is in alignment with Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that provides the FDA with the authority to require manufacturers to conduct post-market surveillance of certain Class II or Class III devices.1

If your Class II or Class III device is intended to be implanted in the body for over a year, the device is a life-supporting device used outside of a user facility, or if failure of your device would be reasonably likely to have serious adverse health consequences, the FDA can require post-market surveillance of your device. PMS can be ordered in response to adverse event reports, or to obtain more information on how a device performs in real-world clinical practice. Whenever post-market surveillance is ordered by the FDA, the manufacturer must submit a PMS plan. Elements of a PMS plan include, but are not limited to, the background of the device, description of data collection procedures/statistical analysis, and timelines.2

PMS is not exclusive to the United States, there are also requirements to maintain a PMS system in both the EU MDR and ISO 13485:2016. Although the requirements differ, the basic principle of post-market surveillance for all markets is to protect public health and allow manufacturers to identify areas for improvement in clinical practice. If you need help developing a PMS plan or ensuring compliance with PMS requirements, EMMA International’s team of quality and regulatory experts are ready to help. Give us a call at 248-987-4497 or email info@emmainternational.com for more information.


1FDA (May 2016) Postmarket Surveillance Under Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act retrieved on 10/4/2020 from: https://www.fda.gov/media/81015/download

2FDA (September 2018) 522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies – FAQ’s retrieved on 10/4/2020 from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/522-postmarket-surveillance-studies/522-postmarket-surveillance-studies-frequently-asked-questions-faqs

Madison Wheeler

Madison Wheeler

Director of Technical Operations - Ms. Wheeler serves as EMMA International’s Director of Technical Operations. She has experience in technical writing, nonconforming product management, issue evaluations, and implementing corrective and preventative actions in the pharmaceuticals and medical device industries. She has experience cross-functionally between R&D, lean manufacturing operations, and RA compliance. Ms. Wheeler also has academic and work experience with human health-risk engineering controls, physiological biophysics, and clinical research. Ms. Wheeler holds a Bachelor of Science in Biosystems Engineering with a concentration in Biomedical Engineering from Michigan State University. She is also a Certified Quality Auditor (CQA), and is currently pursuing her M.S. in Quality Management.

More Resources

Pattern Recognition as a Quality Superpower

Pattern Recognition as a Quality Superpower

There are always new ways and reasons to apply pattern recognition to quality improvement. Better ensuring patient outcomes in health care facilities and improving accuracy for medical diagnoses are two such frontiers.
Record Control for a Regulated World

Record Control for a Regulated World

In a regulated industry, the prevailing posture of regulatory representatives, in my experience, has been “Show me proof.” In fact, the philosophy I’ve heard repeated by regulators is “If it wasn’t documented, it didn’t happen.”
EU MDR SSCP’s: The Importance of Readability

EU MDR SSCP’s: The Importance of Readability

Among many of the new requirements that EU MDR has introduced, the Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is certainly one of the more confusing ones for many firms. SSCP’s are required for implantable and Class III devices under EU MDR and is intended to be a public document summarizing important safety and clinical performance information about the device.

Ready to learn more about working with us?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This