Notifying CDRH of Device Shortages

by | May 8, 2020 | CDRH, Coronavirus, COVID-19, FDA, Medical Devices, Quality Systems, Requirements

COVID-19 has severely disrupted the medical device supply chain. Device manufacturers are typically not required to report shortages of device supplies or interruptions in the production to the FDA. However, in light of the pandemic situation, CDRH requires that device manufacturers report any shortages, interruptions, or permanent discontinuation of devices essential for the prevention or diagnosis of COVID-19.

FDA clarifies that these requirements apply for manufacturers of medical devices who hold the medical marketing submission authorization, or, if a medical device marketing submission is not required, is responsible for listing the device.1

The requirements are applicable to the following device types:1

  • Devices that are critical to public health during a public health emergency, including those that are life-supporting, life-sustaining, or intended for use in emergency medical care or during surgery; or
  • Devices for which FDA determines information on potential meaningful supply disruptions are needed during a public health emergency.

Manufacturers must notify FDA at least six months in advance of a permanent discontinuance of manufacturing or interruptions in the manufacturing of a device. If it is not possible to meet this timeframe, manufacturers must notify the FDA as soon as possible but no later than 7 calendar days after such interruptions or discontinuance. 1

FDA also clarifies that interruptions due to routine maintenance or interruptions in manufacturing of components or raw materials, that do not result in a shortage of the device are not required to be reported as long as the manufacturer resumes its operations in a short period of time not exceeding six months.1

FDA recommends that manufacturers provide updates every two weeks on the situation, including the expected timeline for recovery. This information will allow FDA to work with the manufacturer and other stakeholders to take the necessary steps and prevent shortages of supplies.1

We are closely monitoring the FDA’s changing regulations and requirements for device makers and will keep you informed of major developments. Have more questions? Call us today at 248-987-4497 or email us at

1FDA (May 2020) Notifying CDRH of a Permanent Discontinuance or Interruption in Manufacturing of a Device Under Section 506J of the FD&C Act During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency retrieved on 05/06/2020 from


Nikita Angane

Nikita Angane

Solutions Delivery Specialist - Ms. Angane is a Bioengineering graduate with experience in medical device commercialization, product development, quality system compliance and regulatory affairs. Her portfolio includes working on medical devices, combination products, and pharmaceuticals. As a Solutions Delivery Specialist at EMMA International, she offers her expertise to help our clients achieve an effective and sustainable quality system, and develop regulatory strategies for market access and compliance of new products in the US and international markets. Ms. Angane earned a Bachelor of Engineering in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Mumbai, India and an M.S. in Bioengineering from University of Illinois at Chicago.

More Resources

FDA’s Refusal to Accept Process

FDA’s Refusal to Accept Process

Before the submission of a 510(k) premarket notification, the purpose of which is to notify the FDA of the manufacturer’s intent to market a medical device,[i] there is a provision for acceptance review. This review serves as a method to assess whether a submission is administratively complete and includes all necessary information for FDA to determine substantial equivalence under section 513(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act (21 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 360c(i)). To establish substantial equivalence under this provision, FDA must find the same intended use as the predicate device and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device or appropriate clinical and scientific data necessary to establish that the device is safe and effective as the predicate device. If the Authority is unable to determine substantial equivalence due to insufficient information, it may request for additional information to make that determination. Therefore, as a part of the acceptance review, the FDA staff follows the acceptance checklist[ii] to ensure that the application is administratively complete. These administrative elements are identified as RTA items and are required to be presented. The purpose of conducting the acceptance review is for the Lead Reviewer to determine whether the 510(k) submission meets the minimum threshold of acceptability and should be accepted for substantive review.[iii]
Empowering Your Workforce through Kaizen

Empowering Your Workforce through Kaizen

Last week, I touched on the idea of involving and empowering all employees in the workplace through the corrective and preventive actions process by fostering taking initiative and a problem-solving (refer to blogpost ‘The Art of Addressing Non-Conformances in Operations’). To expand on this concept a bit further, we’re going to be looking at Kaizen–a continuous improvement strategy in which employees at all levels are also empowered to solve problems towards big gains.
FDA’s draft guidelines on Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)

FDA’s draft guidelines on Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)

The pandemic has been a challenging time for all industries including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA had to alter the manner in which it conducted its operations. One set of tools adopted by the FDA in response to COVID-19 was the remote regulatory assessment (RRAs).

Ready to learn more about working with us?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This